Subgroup Verification in Complex Numbers Subgroup Verification in Complex Numbers Testing subgroup properties of H = {a + bi ∈ ℂ ∣ ab ≥ 0} Mathematical Solution Define H = {a + bi ∈ ℂ ∣ a, b ∈ ℝ, ab ≥ 0} . That is, the real and imaginary parts must have the same sign (or one of them is zero). 1. Identity The additive identity in ℂ is 0 + 0i. Since 0·0 = 0 ≥ 0, we have 0 ∈ H. ✅ 2. Closure Take z₁ = 2 + i and z₂ = −1 − 2i. Both satisfy ab ≥ 0. Their sum is 1 − i, and 1×(−1) = −1 3. Inverse For z = a + bi ∈ H, we have ab ≥ 0. Its inverse is −z = −a − bi. Then (−a)(−b) = ab ≥ 0, so −z ∈ H. ✅ Conclusion ✔ Identity exists ✔ Inverses exist ✘ Closure fails Therefore, H is not a subgroup of (ℂ, +). Python Verification A Python program can test many examples to provide evidence ...
Understanding Delta Function Approximations: Sinc-Based Approximation (Fourier Kernel)
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Delta-Convergent Sequences — Refined Blog with SageMath Symbolics, Physics Insights, and Cleaner Code
In the previous blog, we understood the Lorentzian Delta Sequence (Cauchy Kernel) and Gaussian Approximation (Heat Kernel) . Let's take another one step and explore the Sinc-Based Approximation (Fourier Kernel).
Why Study These Approximations?
Delta functions are central in many fields:
- Signal Processing: Ideal impulse, filter response
- Physics: Point charges/masses, Green's functions
- Spectral Theory: Lorentzian profiles in resonance
- Diffusion Models: Gaussians arise from the heat equation
- Numerics: Regularizing singular integrals
Each kernel has a story to tell.
Sinc-Based Approximation (Fourier Kernel)
Formula (with x = 0 defined): \[ f_{\nu}(x) = \begin{cases} \frac{\sin(\nu x)}{\pi x}, & x \neq 0 \\ \frac{\nu}{\pi}, & x = 0 \end{cases} \]
- SOscillatory, from Fourier analysis
- Not always positive
- Still integrates to 1
#Define the Function
var('x nu')
f_sinc(x, nu) = (1/pi) * (sin(nu * x) / x)
f_sinc(x, nu)
#Symbolic Integration Check
var('xi')
assume(nu > 0) # Ensure nu is positive
integral(f_sinc(xi, nu), xi, -oo, oo).simplify_full()
#Limit at ( x = 0 )
limit(f_sinc(x, nu), x=0)
#Alternative Approach: Numerical Evaluation
x_vals = [0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001]
[f_sinc(x, 30).n() for x in x_vals]
#Integral Test (Distributional Behavior)
var('a b')
assume(a < 0, b > 0) # Ensure a < 0 < b to match delta behavior
integral(f_sinc(xi, nu), xi, a, b).simplify_full()
#Numerical Verification
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import sage.all as sage
def sinc_integral(nu, a=-1, b=1):
from scipy.integrate import quad
return quad(lambda x: np.sin(nu*x) / (np.pi*x), a, b)[0]
# Test for different ν values
nu_values = np.linspace(10, 100, 50)
integral_values = [sinc_integral(nu) for nu in nu_values]
# Plotting
plt.figure(figsize=(8, 5))
plt.plot(nu_values, integral_values, marker='o', linestyle='-', color='blue')
plt.axhline(y=1, color='r', linestyle='--', label="Expected Limit (1)")
plt.xlabel(r"$\nu$")
plt.ylabel(r"Integral Value")
plt.title("Numerical Verification: Sinc Integral Convergence")
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True)
plt.show()
#Plot the Sinc Function
p1 = plot(f_sinc(x, 10), (x, -5, 5), color='red', legend_label="ν=10") + \
plot(f_sinc(x, 30), (x, -5, 5), color='blue', legend_label="ν=30") + \
plot(f_sinc(x, 100), (x, -5, 5), color='green', legend_label="ν=100")
p1.show(title="Sinc Approximation to δ(x)", ymin=-1, ymax=3)
#First & Second Derivative Computation
f_sinc_prime(x, nu) = diff(f_sinc(x, nu), x)
f_sinc_double_prime(x, nu) = diff(f_sinc_prime(x, nu), x)
f_sinc_prime(x, nu), f_sinc_double_prime(x, nu)
#Plot the Derivatives
p1 = plot(f_sinc_prime(x, 10), (x, -5, 5), color='red', legend_label="ν=10") + \
plot(f_sinc_prime(x, 30), (x, -5, 5), color='blue', legend_label="ν=30") + \
plot(f_sinc_prime(x, 100), (x, -5, 5), color='green', legend_label="ν=100")
p1.show(title="First Derivative of Sinc Approximation")
p2 = plot(f_sinc_double_prime(x, 10), (x, -5, 5), color='red', legend_label="ν=10") + \
plot(f_sinc_double_prime(x, 30), (x, -5, 5), color='blue', legend_label="ν=30") + \
plot(f_sinc_double_prime(x, 100), (x, -5, 5), color='green', legend_label="ν=100")
p2.show(title="Second Derivative of Sinc Approximation")
p2.show(title="Second Derivative of Gaussian Delta Approximation")
#Integration of the Sinc Sequence
# Compute symbolic integral over a finite range (-a to b)
var('a b')
assume(a < 0, b > 0)
integral(f_sinc(x, nu), x, a, b).simplify_full()
#Plotting the Integrated Sequences
p1 = plot(integral(f_sinc(x, 30), x, -5, 5), (x, -5, 5), color='red', legend_label="Sinc")
p1.show(title="Integrated Delta Approximations")
💡 Try It Yourself! Now You can copy and paste directly into here Run SageMath Code Here
Physics Note
From Fourier theory and sampling, basis of Shannon’s sampling theorem.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
Heuristic Computation and the Discovery of Mersenne Primes
Heuristic Computation and the Discovery of Mersenne Primes Heuristic Computation and the Discovery of Mersenne Primes “Where Strategy Meets Infinity: The Quest for Mersenne Primes” Introduction: The Dance of Numbers and Heuristics Mersenne primes are not just numbers—they are milestones in the vast landscape of mathematics. Defined by the formula: \[ M_p = 2^p - 1 \] where \( p \) is itself prime, these giants challenge our computational limits and inspire new methods of discovery. But why are these primes so elusive? As \( p \) grows, the numbers become astronomically large, making brute-force testing impossible. This is where heuristic computation steps in—guiding us with smart, experience-driven strategies. “In the infinite sea of numbers, heuristics are our compass.” Let’s explore how heuristics and algorithms intertwine to unveil these mathematical treasures. 1. Mersenne Primes — Giants of Number Theory Definition: Numbers of the form \( M_p = 2^p - 1 \...
Understanding the Laplacian of 1/r and the Dirac Delta Function Mathematical Foundations & SageMath Insights
Unmasking the Laplacian: How Mathematics, Physics & AI Use This Powerful Operator Unveiling the Laplacian's Secrets: A Look at 1/r with SageMath Engage & Explore! Before we dive into the math, ask yourself: What does it mean when a function explodes to infinity at a point? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. We'll revisit this after exploring the Dirac delta function! Why Is the Laplacian of \( \frac{1}{r} \) Important? The function \( \frac{1}{r} \) frequently appears in physics to describe potentials like gravity and electrostatics, which depend inversely on distance. Understanding its Laplacian reveals the nature of sources concentrated at singular points. Mathematical Foundation: What Is the Laplacian and a Harmonic Function? The Laplacian operat...
Neural Network Generalization in the Over-Parameterization Regime: Mechanisms, Benefits, and Limitations
Neural Network Generalization in the Over-Parameterization Regime: Mechanisms, Benefits, and Limitations Neural Network Generalization in the Over-Parameterization Regime: Mechanisms, Benefits, and Limitations Introduction Over the past decade, deep neural networks (DNNs) have risen to prominence across a range of machine learning applications, achieving remarkable performance in domains such as computer vision, natural language processing, and reinforcement learning. A striking and counter-intuitive feature of modern DNNs is their propensity for over-parameterization: models often contain many more parameters than training samples, far exceeding the classical regime where statistical learning theory would predict rampant overfitting and poor generalization. Yet, these highly over-parameterized models not only fit the training data perfectly but also display outstanding generalization to unseen test data—often improving as the number of paramete...
Comments
Post a Comment
If you have any queries, do not hesitate to reach out.
Unsure about something? Ask away—I’m here for you!